↓ Skip to main content

Older adults’ reporting of specific sedentary behaviors: validity and reliability

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Older adults’ reporting of specific sedentary behaviors: validity and reliability
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-734
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jelle Van Cauwenberg, Veerle Van Holle, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Neville Owen, Benedicte Deforche

Abstract

Previous questionnaires targeting older adults' sedentary time have underestimated total sedentary time, possibly by not including all relevant specific sedentary behaviors. The current study aimed to investigate the criterion validity and test-retest reliability of a new questionnaire assessing a comprehensive set of sedentary behaviors. Additionally, we examined whether the criterion validity of the questionnaire differed according to age, gender and educational level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 13%
Sports and Recreations 11 11%
Psychology 7 7%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 33 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,769,706
of 24,833,726 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,086
of 16,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,465
of 234,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#113
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,726 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.