You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Predicting fruit consumption: the role of habits, previous behavior and mediation effects
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-730 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hein de Vries, Sander M Eggers, Lilian Lechner, Liesbeth van Osch, Maartje M van Stralen |
Abstract |
This study assessed the role of habits and previous behavior in predicting fruit consumption as well as their additional predictive contribution besides socio-demographic and motivational factors. In the literature, habits are proposed as a stable construct that needs to be controlled for in longitudinal analyses that predict behavior. The aim of this study is to provide empirical evidence for the inclusion of either previous behavior or habits. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
Professor | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 10 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,071,205
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,768
of 15,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,786
of 230,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#156
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.