↓ Skip to main content

Effective delivery of social and behavior change communication through a Care Group model in a supplementary feeding program

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective delivery of social and behavior change communication through a Care Group model in a supplementary feeding program
Published in
Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s41043-017-0111-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Wilner, Devika J. Suri, Breanne K. Langlois, Shelley Marcus Walton, Beatrice Lorge Rogers

Abstract

In 2014, an intervention aimed at increasing the oil in corn soy blend (CSB) porridge prepared by caregivers of children with moderate acute malnutrition was implemented in Southern Malawi. This analysis describes the flow of key messages delivered through the Care Group model during this intervention. The intervention provided a supplementary food ration of CSB and oil and used a Care Group model in which healthcare workers were trained to deliver social and behavior change communication (SBCC) to care group volunteers who then delivered messages to caregivers of beneficiary children. Healthcare workers also delivered messages to caregivers directly. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with all three groups in order to determine the exchange of key messages about ingredient use, storage, and purpose, which were analyzed descriptively. Analysis of SBCC flow and information exchange showed that 100% of caregivers reported learning about the amounts of oil and CSB to use while preparing porridge and over 90% of caregivers, healthcare workers, and care group volunteers reported talking about it. Focus groups confirmed an effective flow of communication among these three groups. This analysis evaluated the flow of key SBCC messages through multiple, overlapping lines of communication among healthcare workers, care group volunteers, and caregivers; the effective transmission of these SBCC messages through this model may contribute to the success of a supplementary feeding intervention program. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01873196 ).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 48 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 54 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,213,149
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#130
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,475
of 323,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them