↓ Skip to main content

Interest of low-dose hydrocortisone therapy during brain-dead organ donor resuscitation: the CORTICOME study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interest of low-dose hydrocortisone therapy during brain-dead organ donor resuscitation: the CORTICOME study
Published in
Critical Care, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13997
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michel Pinsard, Stéphanie Ragot, Paul Michel Mertes, Jean Paul Bleichner, Samira Zitouni, Fabrice Cook, Marc Pierrot, Laurent Dube, Edgard Menguy, Laurent Martin Lefèvre, Laurence Escaravage, Pierre-François Dequin, Philippe Vignon, Nicolas Pichon

Abstract

Circulatory failure during brain death organ donor resuscitation is a problem that compromises recovery of organs. Combined administration of steroid, thyroxine and vasopressin has been proposed to optimize the management of brain deceased donors before recovery of organs. However the single administration of hydrocortisone has not been rigorously evaluated in any trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 57%
Psychology 4 5%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Computer Science 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,997,643
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,902
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,640
of 239,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#58
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.