↓ Skip to main content

A 3-year cohort study of the natural history of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A 3-year cohort study of the natural history of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 in Japan
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0118-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenichi Yasui, Ichiro Yabe, Kunihiro Yoshida, Kazuaki Kanai, Kimihito Arai, Mizuki Ito, Osamu Onodera, Shigeru Koyano, Eiji Isozaki, Setsu Sawai, Yoshiki Adachi, Hidenao Sasaki, Satoshi Kuwabara, Takamichi Hattori, Gen Sobue, Hidehiro Mizusawa, Shoji Tsuji, Masatoyo Nishizawa, Kenji Nakashima

Abstract

Only a few prospective studies have determined which clinical symptoms and factors are associated with the disease severity of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6). A multicenter longitudinal cohort study was conducted to clarify both the natural history of SCA6 in Japan and the factors influencing disease progression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,303,056
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,786
of 2,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,279
of 228,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#30
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.