↓ Skip to main content

Canadian oncogenic human papillomavirus cervical infection prevalence: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Canadian oncogenic human papillomavirus cervical infection prevalence: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-11-235
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea C Tricco, Carmen H Ng, Vladimir Gilca, Andrea Anonychuk, Ba' Pham, Shirra Berliner

Abstract

Oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection prevalence is required to determine optimal vaccination strategies. We systematically reviewed the prevalence of oncogenic cervical HPV infection among Canadian females prior to immunization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 88 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2011.
All research outputs
#18,295,723
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,545
of 7,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,797
of 125,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#58
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.