↓ Skip to main content

Optimal search strategies for detecting cost and economic studies in EMBASE

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimal search strategies for detecting cost and economic studies in EMBASE
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-6-67
Pubmed ID
Authors

R James McKinlay, Nancy L Wilczynski, R Brian Haynes

Abstract

Economic evaluations in the medical literature compare competing diagnosis or treatment methods for their use of resources and their expected outcomes. The best evidence currently available from research regarding both cost and economic comparisons will continue to expand as this type of information becomes more important in today's clinical practice. Researchers and clinicians need quick, reliable ways to access this information. A key source of this type of information is large bibliographic databases such as EMBASE. The objective of this study was to develop search strategies that optimize the retrieval of health costs and economics studies from EMBASE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 61 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Librarian 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor 5 7%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 31%
Computer Science 5 7%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Psychology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,832,455
of 24,162,141 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,476
of 8,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,789
of 161,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#21
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,162,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.