You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A checklist designed to aid consistency and reproducibility of GRADE assessments: development and pilot validation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-82 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nick Meader, Kristel King, Alexis Llewellyn, Gill Norman, Jennifer Brown, Mark Rodgers, Thirimon Moe-Byrne, Julian PT Higgins, Amanda Sowden, Gavin Stewart |
| Abstract |
The grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach is widely implemented in health technology assessment and guideline development organisations throughout the world. GRADE provides a transparent approach to reaching judgements about the quality of evidence on the effects of a health care intervention, but is complex and therefore challenging to apply in a consistent manner. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 17% |
| Denmark | 2 | 4% |
| South Africa | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 58% |
| Scientists | 12 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 303 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 11% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 60 | 20% |
| Unknown | 73 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 12% |
| Psychology | 20 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 54 | 18% |
| Unknown | 97 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,320,201
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#188
of 2,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,844
of 240,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.