↓ Skip to main content

Thrombospondin 1 is a key mediator of transforming growth factor β-mediated cell contractility in systemic sclerosis via a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated…

Overview of attention for article published in Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thrombospondin 1 is a key mediator of transforming growth factor β-mediated cell contractility in systemic sclerosis via a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent mechanism
Published in
Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1755-1536-4-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunliang Chen, Andrew Leask, David J Abraham, Laura Kennedy, Xu Shi-wen, Christopher P Denton, Carol M Black, Liaquat S Verjee, Mark Eastwood

Abstract

The mechanism underlying the ability of fibroblasts to contract a collagen gel matrix is largely unknown. Fibroblasts from scarred (lesional) areas of patients with the fibrotic disease scleroderma show enhanced ability to contract collagen relative to healthy fibroblasts. Thrombospondin 1 (TSP1), an activator of latent transforming growth factor (TGF)β, is overexpressed by scleroderma fibroblasts. In this report we investigate whether activation of latent TGFβ by TSP1 plays a key role in matrix contraction by normal and scleroderma fibroblasts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Other 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Other 9 25%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,124,697
of 24,532,617 outputs
Outputs from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#9
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,044
of 113,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,532,617 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them