You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biology and therapy of fibromyalgia. Evidence-based biomarkers for fibromyalgia syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/ar2443 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dina Dadabhoy, Leslie J Crofford, Michael Spaeth, I Jon Russell, Daniel J Clauw |
| Abstract |
Researchers studying fibromyalgia strive to identify objective, measurable biomarkers that may identify susceptible individuals, may facilitate diagnosis, or that parallel activity of the disease. Candidate objective measures range from sophisticated functional neuroimaging to office-ready measures of the pressure pain threshold. A systematic literature review was completed to assess highly investigated, objective measures used in fibromyalgia studies. To date, only experimental pain testing has been shown to coincide with improvements in clinical status in a longitudinal study. Concerted efforts to systematically evaluate additional objective measures in research trials will be vital for ongoing progress in outcome research and translation into clinical practice. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 199 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 60 | 28% |
| Unknown | 33 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Psychology | 20 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2011.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#3,132
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,227
of 99,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#25
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.