↓ Skip to main content

Suitability of magnetic nanoparticle immobilised cellulases in enhancing enzymatic saccharification of pretreated hemp biomass

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
231 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Suitability of magnetic nanoparticle immobilised cellulases in enhancing enzymatic saccharification of pretreated hemp biomass
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-7-90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reinu E Abraham, Madan L Verma, Colin J Barrow, Munish Puri

Abstract

Previous research focused on pretreatment of biomass, production of fermentable sugars and their consumption to produce ethanol. The main goal of the work was to economise the production process cost of fermentable sugars. Therefore, the objective of the present work was to investigate enzyme hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose and hemp hurds (natural cellulosic substrate) using free and immobilised enzymes. Cellulase from Trichoderma reesei was immobilised on an activated magnetic support by covalent binding and its activity was compared with that of the free enzyme to hydrolyse microcrystalline cellulose and hemp hurds on the basis of thermostability and reusability.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 275 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 17%
Student > Bachelor 42 15%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Master 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 81 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 44 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 12%
Chemistry 27 10%
Engineering 19 7%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 96 35%