↓ Skip to main content

A multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of three physiotherapy-led exercise interventions for knee osteoarthritis in older…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of three physiotherapy-led exercise interventions for knee osteoarthritis in older adults: the BEEP trial protocol (ISRCTN: 93634563)
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-254
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine E Foster, Emma L Healey, Melanie A Holden, Elaine Nicholls, David GT Whitehurst, Susan Jowett, Clare Jinks, Edward Roddy, Elaine M Hay

Abstract

Exercise is consistently recommended for older adults with knee pain related to osteoarthritis. However, the effects from exercise are typically small and short-term, likely linked to insufficient individualisation of the exercise programme and limited attention to supporting exercise adherence over time. The BEEP randomised trial aims to improve patients' short and long-term outcomes from exercise. It will test the overall effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two physiotherapy-led exercise interventions (Individually Tailored Exercise and Targeted Exercise Adherence) to improve the individual tailoring of, and adherence to exercise, compared with usual physiotherapy care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 284 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 10%
Researcher 28 10%
Other 15 5%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 98 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 19%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Sports and Recreations 12 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 104 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#12,901,057
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,739
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,897
of 229,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#35
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.