You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low back pain beliefs are associated to age, location of work, education and pain-related disability in Chinese healthcare professionals working in China: a cross sectional survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-255 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
B-K Tan, Anne J Smith, Peter B O’Sullivan, Gang Chen, Angus F Burnett, Andrew M Briggs |
| Abstract |
Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Evidence pointing towards a more efficacious model of care using a biopsychosocial approach for LBP management highlights the need to understand the pain-related beliefs of patients and those who treat them. The beliefs held by healthcare professionals (HCPs) are known to influence the treatment advice given to patients and consequently management outcomes. Back pain beliefs are known to be influenced by factors such as culture, education, health literacy, place of work, personal experience of LBP and the sequelae of LBP such as disability. There is currently a knowledge gap among these relationships in non-western countries. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between LBP-related beliefs among Chinese HCPs and characteristics of these HCPs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 43% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 71 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 77 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,537,436
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#504
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,634
of 228,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#13
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.