↓ Skip to main content

Work economic sectors and cardiovascular risk factors: cross-sectional analysis based on the RECORD Study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Work economic sectors and cardiovascular risk factors: cross-sectional analysis based on the RECORD Study
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine Lewin, Frédérique Thomas, Bruno Pannier, Basile Chaix

Abstract

Little is known on the comparative effect of work economic sectors on multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Such information may be useful to target Public health interventions, e.g., through the occupational medicine. We investigated whether and how a large panel of cardiovascular risk factors varied between 11 work economic sectors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Unspecified 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,303,056
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,318
of 14,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,400
of 228,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#221
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.