↓ Skip to main content

Review for the generalist: The antinuclear antibody test in children - When to use it and what to do with a positive titer

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Rheumatology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review for the generalist: The antinuclear antibody test in children - When to use it and what to do with a positive titer
Published in
Pediatric Rheumatology, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1546-0096-8-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter N Malleson, Murray J Mackinnon, Michaela Sailer-Hoeck, Charles H Spencer

Abstract

The antinuclear antibody test (ANA) is a much overused test in pediatrics. The ANA does have a role in serologic testing but it should be a very limited one. It is often ordered as a screening test for rheumatic illnesses in a primary care setting. However, since it has low specificity and sensitivity for most rheumatic and musculoskeletal illnesses in children, it should not be ordered as a screening test for non-specific complaints such as musculoskeletal pain. It should only be used as a diagnostic test for children with probable Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) or Mixed Connective Tissue Disease, (MCTD) and other possible overlap-like illnesses. Such children should have developed definite signs and symptoms of a disease before the ANA is ordered. This review presents data supporting these conclusions and a review of the ANA literature in adults and children.By limiting ANA testing, primary care providers can avoid needless venipuncture pain, unnecessary referrals, extra medical expenses, and most importantly, significant parental anxieties. It is best not to do the ANA test in most children but if it ordered and is positive in a low titer (<1:640), the results can be ignored if the child is otherwise well and does not have other features of a systemic illness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Israel 1 1%
Bangladesh 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Other 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,087,317
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Rheumatology
#275
of 713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,696
of 100,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Rheumatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them