You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anaphylaxis-related deaths in Ontario: a retrospective review of cases from 1986 to 2011
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1710-1492-10-38 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ya Sophia Xu, Monika Kastner, Laurie Harada, Anna Xu, Jane Salter, Susan Waserman |
| Abstract |
Examining deaths caused by anaphylaxis may help identify factors that may decrease the risk of these unfortunate events. However, information on fatal anaphylaxis is limited. The objectives of our study were to examine all cases of fatal anaphylaxis in Ontario to determine cause of death, associated features, co factors and trends in mortality. The identification of these factors is important for developing effective strategies to overcome gaps in monitoring and treatment of patients with food allergies and risk for anaphylaxis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 26% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Kuwait | 2 | 7% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 59% |
| Scientists | 6 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,285,020
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#64
of 928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,375
of 240,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.