You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Are Health Facility Management Committees in Kenya ready to implement financial management tasks: findings from a nationally representative survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-404 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Evelyn Waweru, Antony Opwora, Mitsuru Toda, Greg Fegan, Tansy Edwards, Catherine Goodman, Sassy Molyneux |
Abstract |
Community participation in peripheral public health facilities has in many countries focused on including community representatives in Health Facility Management Committees (HFMCs). In Kenya, HFMC roles are being expanded with the phased implementation of the Health Sector Services Fund (HSSF). Under HSSF, HFMCs manage facility funds which are dispersed directly from central level into facility bank accounts. We assessed how prepared HFMCs were to undertake this new role in advance of HSSF roll out, and considered the implications for Kenya and other similar settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Kenya | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 95 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 29% |
Researcher | 14 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 29 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,028,774
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,965
of 8,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,052
of 223,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#53
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.