↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac arrest patients have an impaired immune response, which is not influenced by induced hypothermia

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiac arrest patients have an impaired immune response, which is not influenced by induced hypothermia
Published in
Critical Care, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc14002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte J Beurskens, Janneke Horn, Anita M Tuip de Boer, Marcus J Schultz, Ester MM van Leeuwen, Margreeth B Vroom, Nicole P Juffermans

Abstract

Induced hypothermia is increasingly applied as a therapeutic intervention in ICUs. One of the underlying mechanisms of the beneficial effects of hypothermia is proposed to be reduction of the inflammatory response. However, a fear of reducing the inflammatory response is an increased infection risk. Therefore, we studied the effect of induced hypothermia on immune response after cardiac arrest.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,309,230
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,426
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,527
of 239,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#46
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.