↓ Skip to main content

Automated real-time text messaging as a means for rapidly identifying acute stroke patients for clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automated real-time text messaging as a means for rapidly identifying acute stroke patients for clinical trials
Published in
Trials, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kati Jegzentis, Tim Nowe, Peter Brunecker, Matthias Endres, Bernd Haferkorn, Christoph Ploner, Jens Steinbrink, Gerhard Jan Jungehulsing

Abstract

Recruiting stroke patients into acute treatment trials is challenging because of the urgency of clinical diagnosis, treatment, and trial inclusion. Automated alerts that identify emergency patients promptly may improve trial performance. The main purposes of this project were to develop an automated real-time text messaging system to immediately inform physicians of patients with suspected stroke and to test its feasibility in the emergency setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Computer Science 3 8%
Decision Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 13 33%