↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic nanoparticles for oligodendrocyte precursor cell transplantation therapies: progress and challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Therapies, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic nanoparticles for oligodendrocyte precursor cell transplantation therapies: progress and challenges
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Therapies, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/2052-8426-2-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart I Jenkins, Humphrey H P Yiu, Matthew J Rosseinsky, Divya M Chari

Abstract

Oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) have shown high promise as a transplant population to promote regeneration in the central nervous system, specifically, for the production of myelin - the protective sheath around nerve fibers. While clinical trials for these cells have commenced in some areas, there are currently key barriers to the translation of neural cell therapies. These include the ability to (a) image transplant populations in vivo; (b) genetically engineer transplant cells to augment their repair potential; and (c) safely target cells to sites of pathology. Here, we review the evidence that magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are a 'multifunctional nanoplatform' that can aid in safely addressing these translational challenges in neural cell/OPC therapy: by facilitating real-time and post-mortem assessment of transplant cell biodistribution, and biomolecule delivery to transplant cells, as well as non-invasive 'magnetic cell targeting' to injury sites by application of high gradient fields. We identify key issues relating to the standardization and reporting of physicochemical and biological data in the field; we consider that it will be essential to systematically address these issues in order to fully evaluate the utility of the MNP platform for neural cell transplantation, and to develop efficacious neurocompatible particles for translational applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Neuroscience 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,445,382
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Therapies
#21
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,749
of 239,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Therapies
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.