You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Altered regional homogeneity in experimentally induced low back pain: a resting-state fMRI study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-115 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shan-shan Zhang, Wen Wu, Zi-ping Liu, Guo-zhi Huang, Shi-gui Guo, Jian-ming Yang |
Abstract |
Functional imaging studies have indicated that patients with low back pain can have significant reductions in cerebral cortex grey matter. However, the mechanisms governing the nociceptive pathways in the human brain are unclear. The aim of this study was to use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and regional homogeneity (ReHo) to investigate changes in resting-state brain activity in subjects that experienced experimentally induced low back pain. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hungary | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 22% |
Researcher | 8 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 26% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 15% |
Psychology | 7 | 15% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,165,464
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#246
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,254
of 228,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.