↓ Skip to main content

Regional intensive care transports: a prospective analysis of distance, time and cost for road, helicopter and fixed-wing ambulances

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regional intensive care transports: a prospective analysis of distance, time and cost for road, helicopter and fixed-wing ambulances
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1757-7241-22-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helge Brändström, Ola Winsö, Lars Lindholm, Michael Haney

Abstract

There are three different types of ambulance systems, all of which can manage the same secondary intensive care patient transport mission: road ambulance, rotor-wing ambulance, and fixed-wing ambulance. We hypothesized that costs for specific transport distances would differ between systems. We aimed to analyze distances and observed times for ambulance intensive care secondary transport missions together with system costs to assess this.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 11 25%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 39%
Computer Science 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#13,903,378
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#832
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,217
of 229,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.