↓ Skip to main content

A randomized study of contingency management and spirometric lung age for motivating smoking cessation among injection drug users

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized study of contingency management and spirometric lung age for motivating smoking cessation among injection drug users
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-761
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael B Drummond, Jacquie Astemborski, Allison A Lambert, Scott Goldberg, Maxine L Stitzer, Christian A Merlo, Cynthia S Rand, Robert A Wise, Gregory D Kirk

Abstract

Even after quitting illicit drugs, tobacco abuse remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in former injection drug users. An important unmet need in this population is to have effective interventions that can be used in the context of community based care. Contingency management, where a patient receives a monetary incentive for healthy behavior choices, and incorporation of individual counseling regarding spirometric "lung age" (the age of an average healthy individual with similar spirometry) have been shown to improve cessation rates in some populations. The efficacy of these interventions on improving smoking cessation rates has not been studied among current and former injection drug users.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 23%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 27 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Psychology 6 7%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,198,374
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,311
of 14,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,998
of 228,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#201
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.