You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and evaluation of culturally sensitive psychosocial interventions for under-served people in primary care
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12888-014-0217-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karina Lovell, Jonathan Lamb, Linda Gask, Pete Bower, Waquas Waheed, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Jon Lamb, Saadia Aseem, Susan Beatty, Heather Burroughs, Pam Clarke, Anna Dowrick, Suzanne Edwards, Mark Gabbay, Mari Lloyd-Williams, Chris Dowrick |
Abstract |
Psychological therapy is effective for symptoms of mental distress, but many groups with high levels of mental distress face significant barriers in terms of access to care, as current interventions may not be sensitive to their needs or their understanding of mental health. There is a need to develop forms of psychological therapy that are acceptable to these groups, feasible to deliver in routine settings, and clinically and cost effective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 173 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 20% |
Researcher | 24 | 14% |
Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
Other | 32 | 18% |
Unknown | 40 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 48 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
Unspecified | 7 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 11% |
Unknown | 46 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2020.
All research outputs
#930,668
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#240
of 4,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,008
of 229,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#5
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.