↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between anticipatory, consummatory anhedonia and disorganization in schizotypy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship between anticipatory, consummatory anhedonia and disorganization in schizotypy
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0211-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gwenolé Loas, Annie Verrier, Jean Louis Monestes

Abstract

The disorganized and negative dimensions of schizotypy are characterized by cognitive disorganization and anhedonia, respectively. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationships between these two dimensions of schizotypy by taking into account ambivalence and the distinction between consummatory and anticipatory anhedonia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#14,687,450
of 23,524,722 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,215
of 4,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,578
of 231,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#50
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,524,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.