You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Scan-rescan reproducibility of quantitative assessment of inflammatory carotid atherosclerotic plaque using dynamic contrast-enhanced 3T CMR in a multi-center study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-014-0051-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Huijun Chen, Jie Sun, William S Kerwin, Niranjan Balu, Moni B Neradilek, Daniel S Hippe, Daniel Isquith, Yunjing Xue, Kiyofumi Yamada, Suzanne Peck, Chun Yuan, Kevin D O’Brien, Xue-Qiao Zhao |
Abstract |
The aim of this study is to investigate the inter-scan reproducibility of kinetic parameters in atherosclerotic plaque using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in a multi-center setting at 3T. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 29% |
Professor | 6 | 16% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 42% |
Engineering | 7 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,615,860
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#864
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,785
of 240,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.