↓ Skip to main content

Bench-to-bedside review: Delirium in ICU patients - importance of sleep deprivation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bench-to-bedside review: Delirium in ICU patients - importance of sleep deprivation
Published in
Critical Care, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc8131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald L Weinhouse, Richard J Schwab, Paula L Watson, Namrata Patil, Bernardino Vaccaro, Pratik Pandharipande, E Wesley Ely

Abstract

Delirium occurs frequently in critically ill patients and has been associated with both short-term and long-term consequences. Efforts to decrease delirium prevalence have been directed at identifying and modifying its risk factors. One potentially modifiable risk factor is sleep deprivation. Critically ill patients are known to experience poor sleep quality with severe sleep fragmentation and disruption of sleep architecture. Poor sleep while in the intensive care unit is one of the most common complaints of patients who survive critical illness. The relationship between delirium and sleep deprivation remains controversial. However, studies have demonstrated many similarities between the clinical and physiologic profiles of patients with delirium and sleep deprivation. This article aims to review the literature, the clinical and neurobiologic consequences of sleep deprivation, and the potential relationship between sleep deprivation and delirium in intensive care unit patients. Sleep deprivation may prove to be a modifiable risk factor for the development of delirium with important implications for the acute and long-term outcome of critically ill patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 280 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 13%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Postgraduate 31 11%
Other 29 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Other 81 28%
Unknown 50 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 159 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 15%
Psychology 11 4%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 52 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,280,360
of 22,450,522 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,994
of 5,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,811
of 159,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#13
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,450,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.