↓ Skip to main content

Molecular analysis of the diversity of vaginal microbiota associated with bacterial vaginosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
280 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular analysis of the diversity of vaginal microbiota associated with bacterial vaginosis
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-488
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zongxin Ling, Jianming Kong, Fang Liu, Haibin Zhu, Xiaoyi Chen, Yuezhu Wang, Lanjuan Li, Karen E Nelson, Yaxian Xia, Charlie Xiang

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is an ecological disorder of the vaginal microbiota that affects millions of women annually, and is associated with numerous adverse health outcomes including pre-term birth and the acquisition of sexually transmitted infections. However, little is known about the overall structure and composition of vaginal microbial communities; most of the earlier studies focused on predominant vaginal bacteria in the process of BV. In the present study, the diversity and richness of vaginal microbiota in 50 BV positive and 50 healthy women from China were investigated using culture-independent PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and barcoded 454 pyrosequencing methods, and validated by quantitative PCR.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
South Africa 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 347 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 16%
Researcher 59 16%
Student > Master 57 16%
Student > Bachelor 47 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 67 18%
Unknown 52 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 45 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 62 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,956,108
of 23,760,369 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,071
of 10,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,870
of 97,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,760,369 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,807 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.