You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What elements of the work environment are most responsible for health worker dissatisfaction in rural primary care clinics in Tanzania?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-12-38 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Godfrey M Mbaruku, Elysia Larson, Angela Kimweri, Margaret E Kruk |
| Abstract |
In countries with high maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality, reliable access to quality healthcare in rural areas is essential to save lives. Health workers who are satisfied with their jobs are more likely to remain in rural posts. Understanding what factors influence health workers' satisfaction can help determine where resources should be focused. Although there is a growing body of research assessing health worker satisfaction in hospitals, less is known about health worker satisfaction in rural, primary health clinics. This study explores the workplace satisfaction of health workers in primary health clinics in rural Tanzania. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 45 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2014.
All research outputs
#3,554,951
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#422
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,344
of 241,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.