↓ Skip to main content

Abdominal infections in the intensive care unit: characteristics, treatment and determinants of outcome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Abdominal infections in the intensive care unit: characteristics, treatment and determinants of outcome
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-420
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan De Waele, Jeffrey Lipman, Yasser Sakr, John C Marshall, Philippe Vanhems, Casiano Barrera Groba, Marc Leone, Jean-Louis Vincent, for the EPIC II Investigators

Abstract

Abdominal infections are frequent causes of sepsis and septic shock in the intensive care unit (ICU) and are associated with adverse outcomes. We analyzed the characteristics, treatments and outcome of ICU patients with abdominal infections using data extracted from a one-day point prevalence study, the Extended Prevalence of Infection in the ICU (EPIC) II.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 46 26%
Unknown 46 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 52 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,221,575
of 24,598,501 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,924
of 8,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,825
of 234,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#76
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,598,501 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.