↓ Skip to main content

Health education and the control of intestinal worm infections in China: a new vision

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health education and the control of intestinal worm infections in China: a new vision
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-344
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald P McManus, Franziska A Bieri, Yue-Sheng Li, Gail M Williams, Li-Ping Yuan, Yang Henglin, Zun-Wei Du, Archie CA Clements, Peter Steinmann, Giovanna Raso, Peiling Yap, Ricardo J Soares Magalhães, Donald Stewart, Allen G Ross, Kate Halton, Xiao-Nong Zhou, Remigio M Olveda, Veronica Tallo, Darren J Gray

Abstract

The transmission of soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) is associated with poverty, poor hygiene behaviour, lack of clean water and inadequate waste disposal and sanitation. Periodic administration of benzimidazole drugs is the mainstay for global STH control but it does not prevent re-infection, and is unlikely to interrupt transmission as a stand-alone intervention.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Lecturer 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,190,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#390
of 5,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,493
of 240,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#11
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.