You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Safety, feasibility and effects of an individualised walking intervention for women undergoing chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: a pilot study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-389 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Melissa J Newton, Sandi C Hayes, Monika Janda, Penelope M Webb, Andreas Obermair, Elizabeth G Eakin, David Wyld, Louisa G Gordon, Vanessa L Beesley |
Abstract |
Exercise interventions during adjuvant cancer therapy have been shown to increase functional capacity, relieve fatigue and distress and may assist rates of chemotherapy completion. These studies have been limited to breast, gastric and mixed cancer groups and it is not yet known if a similar intervention is even feasible among women with ovarian cancer. We aimed to assess safety, feasibility and potential effect of a walking intervention in women undergoing chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 179 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 17% |
Researcher | 26 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
Other | 39 | 21% |
Unknown | 41 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 20% |
Sports and Recreations | 18 | 10% |
Psychology | 10 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Other | 22 | 12% |
Unknown | 53 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2011.
All research outputs
#18,616,159
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,156
of 8,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,374
of 127,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#68
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,483 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.