↓ Skip to main content

Double-standards in reporting of risk and responsibility for sexual health: a qualitative content analysis of negatively toned UK newsprint articles

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Double-standards in reporting of risk and responsibility for sexual health: a qualitative content analysis of negatively toned UK newsprint articles
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan P Martin, Lisa M McDaid, Shona Hilton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 108 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 22%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 31 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 23%
Social Sciences 22 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Psychology 7 6%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 33 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,473,528
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,293
of 17,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,278
of 242,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#66
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.