↓ Skip to main content

Traditional uses of plants in a rural community of Mozambique and possible links with Miombodegradation and harvesting sustainability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traditional uses of plants in a rural community of Mozambique and possible links with Miombodegradation and harvesting sustainability
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-10-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Piero Bruschi, Matteo Mancini, Elisabetta Mattioli, Michela Morganti, Maria Adele Signorini

Abstract

Miombo woodlands play an important role in the livelihood of people living in sub-equatorial African countries, contributing to satisfy basic human needs such as food, medicine, fuelwood and building materials. However, over-exploitation of plant resources and unsustainable harvest practices can potentially degrade forests. The aim of this study was to document the use of Miombo plant products, other than medicinal plants, in local communities, within a wider framework in which we discussed possible links between traditional uses and conservation status of the used species and of the whole Miombo environment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uganda 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 166 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Student > Master 21 12%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 28%
Environmental Science 29 17%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 52 30%