You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why functions are not special dispositions: an improved classification of realizables for top-level ontologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Semantics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2041-1480-5-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes Röhl, Ludger Jansen |
| Abstract |
The concept of function is central to both biology and technology, but neither in philosophy nor in formal ontology is there a generally accepted theory of functions. In particular, there is no consensus how to include functions into a top-level ontology or whether to include them at all. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 3 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 15% |
| Engineering | 3 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,714,569
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#95
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,868
of 241,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.