↓ Skip to main content

Changes in weight loss, body composition and cardiovascular disease risk after altering macronutrient distributions during a regular exercise program in obese women

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
48 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in weight loss, body composition and cardiovascular disease risk after altering macronutrient distributions during a regular exercise program in obese women
Published in
Nutrition Journal, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-9-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chad M Kerksick, Jennifer Wismann-Bunn, Donovan Fogt, Ashli R Thomas, Lem Taylor, Bill I Campbell, Colin D Wilborn, Travis Harvey, Mike D Roberts, Paul La Bounty, Melyn Galbreath, Brandon Marcello, Christopher J Rasmussen, Richard B Kreider

Abstract

This study's purpose investigated the impact of different macronutrient distributions and varying caloric intakes along with regular exercise for metabolic and physiological changes related to weight loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 304 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 57 18%
Student > Master 41 13%
Researcher 25 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Other 17 5%
Other 81 26%
Unknown 73 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 20%
Sports and Recreations 43 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 7%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 85 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#844,263
of 25,261,240 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#247
of 1,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,681
of 191,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,261,240 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.