↓ Skip to main content

Clinimetric evaluation of methods to measure muscle functioning in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinimetric evaluation of methods to measure muscle functioning in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-9-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chantal HP de Koning, Sylvia P van den Heuvel, J Bart Staal, Bouwien CM Smits-Engelsman, Erik JM Hendriks

Abstract

Neck pain is a significant health problem in modern society. There is evidence to suggest that neck muscle strength is reduced in patients with neck pain. This article provides a critical analysis of the research literature on the clinimetric properties of tests to measure neck muscle strength or endurance in patients with non-specific neck pain, which can be used in daily practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 1%
India 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 227 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Researcher 19 8%
Other 15 6%
Other 52 22%
Unknown 33 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 22%
Sports and Recreations 10 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 44 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#17,724,033
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,890
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,354
of 91,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.