↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with default from treatment among tuberculosis patients in nairobi province, Kenya: A case control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
508 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with default from treatment among tuberculosis patients in nairobi province, Kenya: A case control study
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-696
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard N Muture, Margaret N Keraka, Peter K Kimuu, Ephantus W Kabiru, Victor O Ombeka, Francis Oguya

Abstract

Successful treatment of tuberculosis (TB) involves taking anti-tuberculosis drugs for at least six months. Poor adherence to treatment means patients remain infectious for longer, are more likely to relapse or succumb to tuberculosis and could result in treatment failure as well as foster emergence of drug resistant tuberculosis. Kenya is among countries with high tuberculosis burden globally. The purpose of this study was to determine the duration tuberculosis patients stay in treatment before defaulting and factors associated with default in Nairobi.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 508 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Kenya 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 496 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 125 25%
Researcher 53 10%
Student > Bachelor 50 10%
Student > Postgraduate 42 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 6%
Other 92 18%
Unknown 115 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 168 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 13%
Social Sciences 37 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 3%
Other 58 11%
Unknown 140 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,239,668
of 24,225,722 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,521
of 15,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,857
of 129,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#25
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,225,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.