↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Cloning and analysis of a bifunctional methyltransferase/restriction endonuclease TspGWI, the prototype of a Thermussp. enzyme family

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Cloning and analysis of a bifunctional methyltransferase/restriction endonuclease TspGWI, the prototype of a Thermussp. enzyme family
Published in
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2199-15-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnieszka Zylicz-Stachula, Janusz M Bujnicki, Piotr M Skowron

Abstract

Correction: The TspGWI restriction endonuclease, which originates from thermophilic Thermus sp. GW, was cloned previously [1] in Escherichia coli (E. coli) using a method employing aa sequencing of proteolytic fragments N-termini, followed by a combination of sequencing of degenerated, inverse and standard PCR products and clones containing the tspGWIRM gene. A combination of these methods yielded a sequence of 3688 bp, comprising an entire TspGWI Open Reading Frame (ORF: 3291 bp) and flanking sequences [GenBank: EF095488, ABO26710]. However, more recent resequencing of the tspGWIRM gene with the use of genomic Thermus sp. GW DNA as a template in PCR, obtained with primers external to ORF, has revealed a sequencing error. This resulted in a frameshift of 233 aa, starting at aa 740 and returning to the original ORF at aa 973. The frameshift was located within the 3'-terminal portion of the gene, coding for a Target Recognition Domain (TRD). The nt sequence of the tspGWIRM gene was corrected at 2217 bp (C insertion) and further downstream at 2915 nt (C deletion), restoring the ORF (Additional file 1 and Figure 5 corrected). New figures have been prepared using the corrected DNA and aa sequences (Figure 5 and Additional file 1). Data concerning corrected nt and aa TspGWI sequence have been deposited in GenBank [GenBank: KJ730526]. The correction was located within a variable TRD segment, thus the conclusions of the bioinformatics sequence analysis must be slightly modified compared to our originally published results [1]. The corrected sequence of TspGWI shows similarity to the TaqII sequence and residues 660-960 in TspGWI that were originally (in the previous version) predicted to be intrinsically disordered, were predicted to be precisely ordered in the corrected version of the sequence (data not shown).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#935
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,505
of 241,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.