↓ Skip to main content

Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: understanding the dynamics of neonatal mortality in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: understanding the dynamics of neonatal mortality in Uganda
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-12-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnes Semwanga Rwashana, Sarah Nakubulwa, Margaret Nakakeeto-Kijjambu, Taghreed Adam

Abstract

Of the three million newborns that die each year, Uganda ranks fifth highest in neonatal mortality rates, with 43,000 neonatal deaths each year. Despite child survival and safe motherhood programmes towards reducing child mortality, insufficient attention has been given to this critical first month of life. There is urgent need to innovatively employ alternative solutions that take into account the intricate complexities of neonatal health and the health systems. In this paper, we set out to empirically contribute to understanding the causes of the stagnating neonatal mortality by applying a systems thinking approach to explore the dynamics arising from the neonatal health complexity and non-linearity and its interplay with health systems factors, using Uganda as a case study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 343 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 20%
Researcher 56 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 81 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 24%
Social Sciences 60 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 5%
Engineering 10 3%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 93 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,060,283
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#278
of 1,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,596
of 232,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.