↓ Skip to main content

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for sepsis: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for sepsis: a meta-analysis
Published in
Critical Care, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lulong Bo, Fei Wang, Jiali Zhu, Jinbao Li, Xiaoming Deng

Abstract

To investigate the effects of G-CSF or GM-CSF therapy in non-neutropenic patients with sepsis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 46%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 27 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,655,547
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,317
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,010
of 194,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.