↓ Skip to main content

Impact of air pollution on respiratory diseases in children with recurrent wheezing or asthma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of air pollution on respiratory diseases in children with recurrent wheezing or asthma
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-14-130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanna Esposito, Carlotta Galeone, Mara Lelii, Benedetta Longhi, Beatrice Ascolese, Laura Senatore, Elisabetta Prada, Valentina Montinaro, Stefano Malerba, Maria Francesca Patria, Nicola Principi

Abstract

Air pollution has many negative health effects on the general population, especially children, subjects with underlying chronic disease and the elderly. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of traffic-related pollution on the exacerbation of asthma and development of respiratory infections in Italian children suffering from asthma or wheezing compared with healthy subjects and to estimate the association between incremental increases in principal pollutants and the incidence of respiratory symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 222 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 16%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 55 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 29%
Environmental Science 22 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Engineering 9 4%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 64 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,327,837
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#321
of 1,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,219
of 231,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.