You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integration of HIV and cervical cancer screening perceptions of healthcare providers and policy makers in Uganda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-810 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward Kumakech, Sören Andersson, Henry Wabinga, Vanja Berggren |
| Abstract |
HIV-positive women have an increased risk of developing cervical cancer (CC) compared to the HIV-negative women. Despite this, HIV and CC screening programs in many developing countries have remained disintegrated. Therefore, the objective of the study was to explore perceptions of healthcare providers (HCP) and policy makers (PM) about integration of HIV and CC screening services in Uganda. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#13,917,593
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,034
of 14,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,422
of 230,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#182
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.