↓ Skip to main content

Fasting insulin sensitivity indices are not better than routine clinical variables at predicting insulin sensitivity among Black Africans: a clamp study in sub-Saharan Africans

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Endocrine Disorders, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fasting insulin sensitivity indices are not better than routine clinical variables at predicting insulin sensitivity among Black Africans: a clamp study in sub-Saharan Africans
Published in
BMC Endocrine Disorders, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6823-14-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene Sobngwi, Andre-Pascal Kengne, Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui, Simeon Choukem, Joelle Sobngwi-Tambekou, Eric V Balti, Mark S Pearce, Valentin Siaha, Aissa S Mamdjokam, Valery Effoe, Eric Lontchi-Yimagou, Oliver T Donfack, Barbara Atogho-Tiedeu, Philippe Boudou, Jean-Francois Gautier, Jean-Claude Mbanya

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the predictive utility of common fasting insulin sensitivity indices, and non-laboratory surrogates [BMI, waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR)] in sub-Saharan Africans without diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cameroon 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,783,222
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#367
of 745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,716
of 230,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.