You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Teaching statistics to medical students using problem-based learning: the Australian experience
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, December 2004
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-4-31 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J Martin Bland |
Abstract |
Problem-based learning (PBL) is gaining popularity as a teaching method in UK medical schools, but statistics and research methods are not being included in this teaching. There are great disadvantages in omitting statistics and research methods from the main teaching. PBL is well established in Australian medical schools. The Australian experience in teaching statistics and research methods in curricula based on problem-based learning may provide guidance for other countries, such as the UK, where this method is being introduced. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nepal | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 177 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 34 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
Other | 47 | 25% |
Unknown | 39 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
Computer Science | 11 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
Mathematics | 9 | 5% |
Other | 43 | 23% |
Unknown | 47 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,410,980
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,711
of 3,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,708
of 139,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.