↓ Skip to main content

Comparative genomics of koala, cattle and sheep strains of Chlamydia pecorum

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative genomics of koala, cattle and sheep strains of Chlamydia pecorum
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-667
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan L Bachmann, Tamieka A Fraser, Claire Bertelli, Martina Jelocnik, Amber Gillett, Oliver Funnell, Cheyne Flanagan, Garry S A Myers, Peter Timms, Adam Polkinghorne

Abstract

Chlamydia pecorum is an important pathogen of domesticated livestock including sheep, cattle and pigs. This pathogen is also a key factor in the decline of the koala in Australia. We sequenced the genomes of three koala C. pecorum strains, isolated from the urogenital tracts and conjunctiva of diseased koalas. The genome of the C. pecorum VR629 (IPA) strain, isolated from a sheep with polyarthritis, was also sequenced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 10%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,793,558
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,002
of 10,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,489
of 230,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#15
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.