↓ Skip to main content

Impact of health education intervention on knowledge and perception of cervical cancer and cervical screening uptake among adult women in rural communities in Nigeria

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of health education intervention on knowledge and perception of cervical cancer and cervical screening uptake among adult women in rural communities in Nigeria
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-814
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olumide A Abiodun, Oluwatosin O Olu-Abiodun, John O Sotunsa, Francis A Oluwole

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a disease of public health importance affecting many women and contributing to avoidably high levels of cancer deaths in Nigeria. In spite of the relative ease of prevention, the incidence is on the increase. This study aimed to determine the effect of health education on the awareness, knowledge and perception of cervical cancer and screening among women in rural Nigerian communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 367 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 21%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Researcher 32 9%
Student > Postgraduate 29 8%
Lecturer 27 7%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 97 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 18%
Social Sciences 31 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 112 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2014.
All research outputs
#4,051,545
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,509
of 14,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,558
of 230,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#78
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.