↓ Skip to main content

Can the feedback of patient assessments, brief training, or their combination, improve the interpersonal skills of primary care physicians? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can the feedback of patient assessments, brief training, or their combination, improve the interpersonal skills of primary care physicians? A systematic review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2008
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-8-179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Peter Bower

Abstract

Improving quality of primary care is a key focus of international health policy. Current quality improvement efforts place a large focus on technical, clinical aspects of quality, but a comprehensive approach to quality improvement should also include interpersonal care. Two methods of improving the quality of interpersonal care in primary care have been proposed. One involves the feedback of patient assessments of interpersonal care to physicians, and the other involves brief training and education programmes. This study therefore reviewed the efficacy of (i) feedback of real patient assessments of interpersonal care skills, (ii) brief training focused on the improvement of interpersonal care (iii) interventions combining both (i) and (ii)

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Australia 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 147 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Other 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 38 24%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 37%
Psychology 24 15%
Social Sciences 21 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 24 15%