↓ Skip to main content

Pathological features of Breast Cancer seen in Northwestern Tanzania: a nine years retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathological features of Breast Cancer seen in Northwestern Tanzania: a nine years retrospective study
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-4-214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter F Rambau, Philipo L Chalya, Mange M Manyama, Kahima J Jackson

Abstract

Breast cancer is more common in Western Countries compared to African populations. However in African population, it appears that the disease tends to be more aggressive and occurring at a relatively young age at the time of presentation. The aim of this study was to describe the trend of Breast Cancer in Northwestern Tanzania.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Postgraduate 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 17 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2011.
All research outputs
#9,958,512
of 12,440,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,932
of 2,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,497
of 91,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,780 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.