↓ Skip to main content

Experiences of and responses to disrespectful maternity care and abuse during childbirth; a qualitative study with women and men in Morogoro Region, Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
512 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experiences of and responses to disrespectful maternity care and abuse during childbirth; a qualitative study with women and men in Morogoro Region, Tanzania
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-268
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shannon A McMahon, Asha S George, Joy J Chebet, Idda H Mosha, Rose NM Mpembeni, Peter J Winch

Abstract

Interventions to reduce maternal mortality have focused on delivery in facilities, yet in many low-resource settings rates of facility-based birth have remained persistently low. In Tanzania, rates of facility delivery have remained static for more than 20 years. With an aim to advance research and inform policy changes, this paper builds on a growing body of work that explores dimensions of and responses to disrespectful maternity care and abuse during childbirth in facilities across Morogoro Region, Tanzania.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 512 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uganda 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 1 <1%
Unknown 506 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 111 22%
Researcher 61 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 10%
Student > Bachelor 37 7%
Student > Postgraduate 35 7%
Other 105 21%
Unknown 112 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 97 19%
Social Sciences 94 18%
Arts and Humanities 9 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 39 8%
Unknown 135 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,256,202
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#263
of 4,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,289
of 238,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#5
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.